Java并发编程:深入剖析ThreadLocal

一.对ThreadLocal的理解

ThreadLocal,很多地方叫做线程本地变量,也有些地方叫做线程本地存储,其实意思差不多。可能很多朋友都知道ThreadLocal为变量在每个线程中都创建了一个副本,那么每个线程可以访问自己内部的副本变量。 这句话从字面上看起来很容易理解,但是真正理解并不是那么容易。 我们还是先来看一个例子:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
class ConnectionManager {

private static Connection connect = null;

public static Connection openConnection() {
if(connect == null){
connect = DriverManager.getConnection();
}
return connect;
}

public static void closeConnection() {
if(connect!=null)
connect.close();
}
}

假设有这样一个数据库链接管理类,这段代码在单线程中使用是没有任何问题的,但是如果在多线程中使用呢?很显然,在多线程中使用会存在线程安全问题:第一,这里面的2个方法都没有进行同步,很可能在openConnection方法中会多次创建connect;第二,由于connect是共享变量,那么必然在调用connect的地方需要使用到同步来保障线程安全,因为很可能一个线程在使用connect进行数据库操作,而另外一个线程调用closeConnection关闭链接。

所以出于线程安全的考虑,必须将这段代码的两个方法进行同步处理,并且在调用connect的地方需要进行同步处理。这样将会大大影响程序执行效率,因为一个线程在使用connect进行数据库操作的时候,其他线程只有等待。

那么大家来仔细分析一下这个问题,这地方到底需不需要将connect变量进行共享?事实上,是不需要的。假如每个线程中都有一个connect变量,各个线程之间对connect变量的访问实际上是没有依赖关系的,即一个线程不需要关心其他线程是否对这个connect进行了修改的。

到这里,可能会有朋友想到,既然不需要在线程之间共享这个变量,可以直接这样处理,在每个需要使用数据库连接的方法中具体使用时才创建数据库链接,然后在方法调用完毕再释放这个连接。比如下面这样:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
class ConnectionManager {

private Connection connect = null;

public Connection openConnection() {
if(connect == null){
connect = DriverManager.getConnection();
}
return connect;
}

public void closeConnection() {
if(connect!=null)
connect.close();
}
}

class Dao{
public void insert() {
ConnectionManager connectionManager = new ConnectionManager();
Connection connection = connectionManager.openConnection();

//使用connection进行操作

connectionManager.closeConnection();
}
}

这样处理确实也没有任何问题,由于每次都是在方法内部创建的连接,那么线程之间自然不存在线程安全问题。但是这样会有一个致命的影响:导致服务器压力非常大,并且严重影响程序执行性能。由于在方法中需要频繁地开启和关闭数据库连接,这样不尽严重影响程序执行效率,还可能导致服务器压力巨大。

那么这种情况下使用ThreadLocal是再适合不过的了,因为ThreadLocal在每个线程中对该变量会创建一个副本,即每个线程内部都会有一个该变量,且在线程内部任何地方都可以使用,线程之间互不影响,这样一来就不存在线程安全问题,也不会严重影响程序执行性能。

但是要注意,虽然ThreadLocal能够解决上面说的问题,但是由于在每个线程中都创建了副本,所以要考虑它对资源的消耗,比如内存的占用会比不使用ThreadLocal要大。

二.深入解析ThreadLocal类

在上面谈到了对ThreadLocal的一些理解,那我们下面来看一下具体ThreadLocal是如何实现的。

先了解一下ThreadLocal类提供的几个方法:

1
2
3
4
public T get() { }
public void set(T value) { }
public void remove() { }
protected T initialValue() { }

get()方法是用来获取ThreadLocal在当前线程中保存的变量副本,set()用来设置当前线程中变量的副本,remove()用来移除当前线程中变量的副本,initialValue()是一个protected方法,一般是用来在使用时进行重写的,它是一个延迟加载方法,下面会详细说明。

首先我们来看一下ThreadLocal类是如何为每个线程创建一个变量的副本的。 先看下get方法的实现:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
/**
* Returns the value in the current thread's copy of this
* thread-local variable. If the variable has no value for the
* current thread, it is first initialized to the value returned
* by an invocation of the {@link #initialValue} method.
*
* @return the current thread's value of this thread-local
*/
public T get() {
Thread t = Thread.currentThread();
ThreadLocalMap map = getMap(t);
if (map != null) {
ThreadLocalMap.Entry e = map.getEntry(this);
if (e != null)
return (T)e.value;
}
return setInitialValue();
}

第一句是取得当前线程,然后通过getMap(t)方法获取到一个map,map的类型为ThreadLocalMap。然后接着下面获取到<key,value>键值对,注意这里获取键值对传进去的是 this,而不是当前线程t。如果获取成功,则返回value值。如果map为空,则调用setInitialValue方法返回value。 我们上面的每一句来仔细分析: 首先看一下getMap方法中做了什么:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
/**
* Get the map associated with a ThreadLocal. Overridden in
* InheritableThreadLocal.
*
* @param t the current thread
* @return the map
*/
ThreadLocalMap getMap(Thread t) {
return t.threadLocals;
}

可能大家没有想到的是,在getMap中,是调用当期线程t,返回当前线程t中的一个成员变量threadLocals。 那么我们继续取Thread类中取看一下成员变量threadLocals是什么:

1
2
3
/* ThreadLocal values pertaining to this thread. This map is maintained
* by the ThreadLocal class. */
ThreadLocal.ThreadLocalMap threadLocals = null;

实际上就是一个ThreadLocalMap,这个类型是ThreadLocal类的一个内部类,我们继续取看ThreadLocalMap的实现:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
/**
* ThreadLocalMap is a customized hash map suitable only for
* maintaining thread local values. No operations are exported
* outside of the ThreadLocal class. The class is package private to
* allow declaration of fields in class Thread. To help deal with
* very large and long-lived usages, the hash table entries use
* WeakReferences for keys. However, since reference queues are not
* used, stale entries are guaranteed to be removed only when
* the table starts running out of space.
*/
static class ThreadLocalMap {

/**
* The entries in this hash map extend WeakReference, using
* its main ref field as the key (which is always a
* ThreadLocal object). Note that null keys (i.e. entry.get()
* == null) mean that the key is no longer referenced, so the
* entry can be expunged from table. Such entries are referred to
* as "stale entries" in the code that follows.
*/
static class Entry extends WeakReference<ThreadLocal> {
/** The value associated with this ThreadLocal. */
Object value;

Entry(ThreadLocal k, Object v) {
super(k);
value = v;
}
}

/**
* The initial capacity -- MUST be a power of two.
*/
private static final int INITIAL_CAPACITY = 16;

/**
* The table, resized as necessary.
* table.length MUST always be a power of two.
*/
private Entry[] table;

/**
* The number of entries in the table.
*/
private int size = 0;

/**
* The next size value at which to resize.
*/
private int threshold; // Default to 0

/**
* Set the resize threshold to maintain at worst a 2/3 load factor.
*/
private void setThreshold(int len) {
threshold = len * 2 / 3;
}

/**
* Increment i modulo len.
*/
private static int nextIndex(int i, int len) {
return ((i + 1 < len) ? i + 1 : 0);
}

/**
* Decrement i modulo len.
*/
private static int prevIndex(int i, int len) {
return ((i - 1 >= 0) ? i - 1 : len - 1);
}

/**
* Construct a new map initially containing (firstKey, firstValue).
* ThreadLocalMaps are constructed lazily, so we only create
* one when we have at least one entry to put in it.
*/
ThreadLocalMap(ThreadLocal firstKey, Object firstValue) {
table = new Entry[INITIAL_CAPACITY];
int i = firstKey.threadLocalHashCode & (INITIAL_CAPACITY - 1);
table[i] = new Entry(firstKey, firstValue);
size = 1;
setThreshold(INITIAL_CAPACITY);
}

/**
* Construct a new map including all Inheritable ThreadLocals
* from given parent map. Called only by createInheritedMap.
*
* @param parentMap the map associated with parent thread.
*/
private ThreadLocalMap(ThreadLocalMap parentMap) {
Entry[] parentTable = parentMap.table;
int len = parentTable.length;
setThreshold(len);
table = new Entry[len];

for (int j = 0; j < len; j++) {
Entry e = parentTable[j];
if (e != null) {
ThreadLocal key = e.get();
if (key != null) {
Object value = key.childValue(e.value);
Entry c = new Entry(key, value);
int h = key.threadLocalHashCode & (len - 1);
while (table[h] != null)
h = nextIndex(h, len);
table[h] = c;
size++;
}
}
}
}

/**
* Get the entry associated with key. This method
* itself handles only the fast path: a direct hit of existing
* key. It otherwise relays to getEntryAfterMiss. This is
* designed to maximize performance for direct hits, in part
* by making this method readily inlinable.
*
* @param key the thread local object
* @return the entry associated with key, or null if no such
*/
private Entry getEntry(ThreadLocal key) {
int i = key.threadLocalHashCode & (table.length - 1);
Entry e = table[i];
if (e != null && e.get() == key)
return e;
else
return getEntryAfterMiss(key, i, e);
}

/**
* Version of getEntry method for use when key is not found in
* its direct hash slot.
*
* @param key the thread local object
* @param i the table index for key's hash code
* @param e the entry at table[i]
* @return the entry associated with key, or null if no such
*/
private Entry getEntryAfterMiss(ThreadLocal key, int i, Entry e) {
Entry[] tab = table;
int len = tab.length;

while (e != null) {
ThreadLocal k = e.get();
if (k == key)
return e;
if (k == null)
expungeStaleEntry(i);
else
i = nextIndex(i, len);
e = tab[i];
}
return null;
}

/**
* Set the value associated with key.
*
* @param key the thread local object
* @param value the value to be set
*/
private void set(ThreadLocal key, Object value) {

// We don't use a fast path as with get() because it is at
// least as common to use set() to create new entries as
// it is to replace existing ones, in which case, a fast
// path would fail more often than not.

Entry[] tab = table;
int len = tab.length;
int i = key.threadLocalHashCode & (len-1);

for (Entry e = tab[i];
e != null;
e = tab[i = nextIndex(i, len)]) {
ThreadLocal k = e.get();

if (k == key) {
e.value = value;
return;
}

if (k == null) {
replaceStaleEntry(key, value, i);
return;
}
}

tab[i] = new Entry(key, value);
int sz = ++size;
if (!cleanSomeSlots(i, sz) && sz >= threshold)
rehash();
}

/**
* Remove the entry for key.
*/
private void remove(ThreadLocal key) {
Entry[] tab = table;
int len = tab.length;
int i = key.threadLocalHashCode & (len-1);
for (Entry e = tab[i];
e != null;
e = tab[i = nextIndex(i, len)]) {
if (e.get() == key) {
e.clear();
expungeStaleEntry(i);
return;
}
}
}

/**
* Replace a stale entry encountered during a set operation
* with an entry for the specified key. The value passed in
* the value parameter is stored in the entry, whether or not
* an entry already exists for the specified key.
*
* As a side effect, this method expunges all stale entries in the
* "run" containing the stale entry. (A run is a sequence of entries
* between two null slots.)
*
* @param key the key
* @param value the value to be associated with key
* @param staleSlot index of the first stale entry encountered while
* searching for key.
*/
private void replaceStaleEntry(ThreadLocal key, Object value,
int staleSlot) {
Entry[] tab = table;
int len = tab.length;
Entry e;

// Back up to check for prior stale entry in current run.
// We clean out whole runs at a time to avoid continual
// incremental rehashing due to garbage collector freeing
// up refs in bunches (i.e., whenever the collector runs).
int slotToExpunge = staleSlot;
for (int i = prevIndex(staleSlot, len);
(e = tab[i]) != null;
i = prevIndex(i, len))
if (e.get() == null)
slotToExpunge = i;

// Find either the key or trailing null slot of run, whichever
// occurs first
for (int i = nextIndex(staleSlot, len);
(e = tab[i]) != null;
i = nextIndex(i, len)) {
ThreadLocal k = e.get();

// If we find key, then we need to swap it
// with the stale entry to maintain hash table order.
// The newly stale slot, or any other stale slot
// encountered above it, can then be sent to expungeStaleEntry
// to remove or rehash all of the other entries in run.
if (k == key) {
e.value = value;

tab[i] = tab[staleSlot];
tab[staleSlot] = e;

// Start expunge at preceding stale entry if it exists
if (slotToExpunge == staleSlot)
slotToExpunge = i;
cleanSomeSlots(expungeStaleEntry(slotToExpunge), len);
return;
}

// If we didn't find stale entry on backward scan, the
// first stale entry seen while scanning for key is the
// first still present in the run.
if (k == null && slotToExpunge == staleSlot)
slotToExpunge = i;
}

// If key not found, put new entry in stale slot
tab[staleSlot].value = null;
tab[staleSlot] = new Entry(key, value);

// If there are any other stale entries in run, expunge them
if (slotToExpunge != staleSlot)
cleanSomeSlots(expungeStaleEntry(slotToExpunge), len);
}

/**
* Expunge a stale entry by rehashing any possibly colliding entries
* lying between staleSlot and the next null slot. This also expunges
* any other stale entries encountered before the trailing null. See
* Knuth, Section 6.4
*
* @param staleSlot index of slot known to have null key
* @return the index of the next null slot after staleSlot
* (all between staleSlot and this slot will have been checked
* for expunging).
*/
private int expungeStaleEntry(int staleSlot) {
Entry[] tab = table;
int len = tab.length;

// expunge entry at staleSlot
tab[staleSlot].value = null;
tab[staleSlot] = null;
size--;

// Rehash until we encounter null
Entry e;
int i;
for (i = nextIndex(staleSlot, len);
(e = tab[i]) != null;
i = nextIndex(i, len)) {
ThreadLocal k = e.get();
if (k == null) {
e.value = null;
tab[i] = null;
size--;
} else {
int h = k.threadLocalHashCode & (len - 1);
if (h != i) {
tab[i] = null;

// Unlike Knuth 6.4 Algorithm R, we must scan until
// null because multiple entries could have been stale.
while (tab[h] != null)
h = nextIndex(h, len);
tab[h] = e;
}
}
}
return i;
}

/**
* Heuristically scan some cells looking for stale entries.
* This is invoked when either a new element is added, or
* another stale one has been expunged. It performs a
* logarithmic number of scans, as a balance between no
* scanning (fast but retains garbage) and a number of scans
* proportional to number of elements, that would find all
* garbage but would cause some insertions to take O(n) time.
*
* @param i a position known NOT to hold a stale entry. The
* scan starts at the element after i.
*
* @param n scan control: <tt>log2(n)</tt> cells are scanned,
* unless a stale entry is found, in which case
* <tt>log2(table.length)-1</tt> additional cells are scanned.
* When called from insertions, this parameter is the number
* of elements, but when from replaceStaleEntry, it is the
* table length. (Note: all this could be changed to be either
* more or less aggressive by weighting n instead of just
* using straight log n. But this version is simple, fast, and
* seems to work well.)
*
* @return true if any stale entries have been removed.
*/
private boolean cleanSomeSlots(int i, int n) {
boolean removed = false;
Entry[] tab = table;
int len = tab.length;
do {
i = nextIndex(i, len);
Entry e = tab[i];
if (e != null && e.get() == null) {
n = len;
removed = true;
i = expungeStaleEntry(i);
}
} while ( (n >>>= 1) != 0);
return removed;
}

/**
* Re-pack and/or re-size the table. First scan the entire
* table removing stale entries. If this doesn't sufficiently
* shrink the size of the table, double the table size.
*/
private void rehash() {
expungeStaleEntries();

// Use lower threshold for doubling to avoid hysteresis
if (size >= threshold - threshold / 4)
resize();
}

/**
* Double the capacity of the table.
*/
private void resize() {
Entry[] oldTab = table;
int oldLen = oldTab.length;
int newLen = oldLen * 2;
Entry[] newTab = new Entry[newLen];
int count = 0;

for (int j = 0; j < oldLen; ++j) {
Entry e = oldTab[j];
if (e != null) {
ThreadLocal k = e.get();
if (k == null) {
e.value = null; // Help the GC
} else {
int h = k.threadLocalHashCode & (newLen - 1);
while (newTab[h] != null)
h = nextIndex(h, newLen);
newTab[h] = e;
count++;
}
}
}

setThreshold(newLen);
size = count;
table = newTab;
}

/**
* Expunge all stale entries in the table.
*/
private void expungeStaleEntries() {
Entry[] tab = table;
int len = tab.length;
for (int j = 0; j < len; j++) {
Entry e = tab[j];
if (e != null && e.get() == null)
expungeStaleEntry(j);
}
}
}

可以看到ThreadLocalMap的Entry继承了WeakReference,并且使用ThreadLocal作为键值。 然后再继续看setInitialValue方法的具体实现:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
/**
* Variant of set() to establish initialValue. Used instead
* of set() in case user has overridden the set() method.
*
* @return the initial value
*/
private T setInitialValue() {
T value = initialValue();
Thread t = Thread.currentThread();
ThreadLocalMap map = getMap(t);
if (map != null)
map.set(this, value);
else
createMap(t, value);
return value;
}

很容易了解,就是如果map不为空,就设置键值对,为空,再创建Map,看一下createMap的实现:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
/**
* Create the map associated with a ThreadLocal. Overridden in
* InheritableThreadLocal.
*
* @param t the current thread
* @param firstValue value for the initial entry of the map
* @param map the map to store.
*/
void createMap(Thread t, T firstValue) {
t.threadLocals = new ThreadLocalMap(this, firstValue);
}

至此,可能大部分朋友已经明白了ThreadLocal是如何为每个线程创建变量的副本的:

首先,在每个线程Thread内部有一个ThreadLocal.ThreadLocalMap类型的成员变量threadLocals,这个threadLocals就是用来存储实际的变量副本的,键值为当前ThreadLocal变量,value为变量副本(即T类型的变量)。

初始时,在Thread里面,threadLocals为空,当通过ThreadLocal变量调用get()方法或者set()方法,就会对Thread类中的threadLocals进行初始化,并且以当前ThreadLocal变量为键值,以ThreadLocal要保存的副本变量为value,存到threadLocals。

然后在当前线程里面,如果要使用副本变量,就可以通过get方法在threadLocals里面查找。

下面通过一个例子来证明通过ThreadLocal能达到在每个线程中创建变量副本的效果:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
public class Test {
ThreadLocal<Long> longLocal = new ThreadLocal<Long>();
ThreadLocal<String> stringLocal = new ThreadLocal<String>();


public void set() {
longLocal.set(Thread.currentThread().getId());
stringLocal.set(Thread.currentThread().getName());
}

public long getLong() {
return longLocal.get();
}

public String getString() {
return stringLocal.get();
}

public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
final Test test = new Test();


test.set();
System.out.println(test.getLong());
System.out.println(test.getString());


Thread thread1 = new Thread(){
public void run() {
test.set();
System.out.println(test.getLong());
System.out.println(test.getString());
};
};
thread1.start();
thread1.join();

System.out.println(test.getLong());
System.out.println(test.getString());
}
}

输出结果:

1
2
3
4
5
6
1
main
8
Thread-0
1
main

从这段代码的输出结果可以看出,在main线程中和thread1线程中,longLocal保存的副本值和stringLocal保存的副本值都不一样。最后一次在main线程再次打印副本值是为了证明在main线程中和thread1线程中的副本值确实是不同的。

总结一下:

  1. 实际的通过ThreadLocal创建的副本是存储在每个线程自己的threadLocals中的;
  2. 为何threadLocals的类型ThreadLocalMap的键值为ThreadLocal对象,因为每个线程中可有多个threadLocal变量,就像上面代码中的longLocal和stringLocal;
  3. 在进行get之前,必须先set,否则会报空指针异常;

如果想在get之前不需要调用set就能正常访问的话,必须重写initialValue()方法。因为在上面的代码分析过程中,我们发现如果没有先set的话,即在map中查找不到对应的存储,则会通过调用setInitialValue方法返回i,而在setInitialValue方法中,有一个语句是T value = initialValue(), 而默认情况下,initialValue方法返回的是null。

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
/**
* Returns the value in the current thread's copy of this
* thread-local variable. If the variable has no value for the
* current thread, it is first initialized to the value returned
* by an invocation of the {@link #initialValue} method.
*
* @return the current thread's value of this thread-local
*/
public T get() {
Thread t = Thread.currentThread();
ThreadLocalMap map = getMap(t);
if (map != null) {
ThreadLocalMap.Entry e = map.getEntry(this);
if (e != null)
return (T)e.value;
}
return setInitialValue();
}

/**
* Variant of set() to establish initialValue. Used instead
* of set() in case user has overridden the set() method.
*
* @return the initial value
*/
private T setInitialValue() {
T value = initialValue();
Thread t = Thread.currentThread();
ThreadLocalMap map = getMap(t);
if (map != null)
map.set(this, value);
else
createMap(t, value);
return value;
}

看下面这个例子:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
public class Test {
ThreadLocal<Long> longLocal = new ThreadLocal<Long>();
ThreadLocal<String> stringLocal = new ThreadLocal<String>();

public void set() {
longLocal.set(Thread.currentThread().getId());
stringLocal.set(Thread.currentThread().getName());
}

public long getLong() {
return longLocal.get();
}

public String getString() {
return stringLocal.get();
}

public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
final Test test = new Test();

System.out.println(test.getLong());
System.out.println(test.getString());

Thread thread1 = new Thread(){
public void run() {
test.set();
System.out.println(test.getLong());
System.out.println(test.getString());
};
};
thread1.start();
thread1.join();

System.out.println(test.getLong());
System.out.println(test.getString());
}
}

在main线程中,没有先set,直接get的话,运行时会报空指针异常。 但是如果改成下面这段代码,即重写了initialValue方法:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
public class Test {
ThreadLocal<Long> longLocal = new ThreadLocal<Long>(){
protected Long initialValue() {
return Thread.currentThread().getId();
};
};
ThreadLocal<String> stringLocal = new ThreadLocal<String>(){;
protected String initialValue() {
return Thread.currentThread().getName();
};
};


public void set() {
longLocal.set(Thread.currentThread().getId());
stringLocal.set(Thread.currentThread().getName());
}

public long getLong() {
return longLocal.get();
}

public String getString() {
return stringLocal.get();
}

public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
final Test test = new Test();

test.set();
System.out.println(test.getLong());
System.out.println(test.getString());


Thread thread1 = new Thread(){
public void run() {
test.set();
System.out.println(test.getLong());
System.out.println(test.getString());
};
};
thread1.start();
thread1.join();

System.out.println(test.getLong());
System.out.println(test.getString());
}
}

就可以直接不用先set而直接调用get了。

三.ThreadLocal的应用场景

最常见的ThreadLocal使用场景为 用来解决 数据库连接、Session管理等。 如:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
private static ThreadLocal<Connection> connectionHolder
= new ThreadLocal<Connection>() {
public Connection initialValue() {
return DriverManager.getConnection(DB_URL);
}
};

public static Connection getConnection() {
return connectionHolder.get();
}

private static final ThreadLocal threadSession = new ThreadLocal();

public static Session getSession() throws InfrastructureException {
Session s = (Session) threadSession.get();
try {
if (s == null) {
s = getSessionFactory().openSession();
threadSession.set(s);
}
} catch (HibernateException ex) {
throw new InfrastructureException(ex);
}
return s;
}
坚持原创技术分享,您的支持将鼓励我继续创作!